Quote:*Shrug*

 

I'll take the decision of the FBI director, who has sworn an oath to defend the constitution of the United States of America, over the partisan operatives at National Review.

 

That opinion is that no reasonable prosecutor would take this case based on the evidence uncovered, which, by the way, was not revealed to you, me, or National Review.

 

jj, there's plenty of meat out there for you and the other right wingers to gnaw on.  The director laid out a scathing criticism of the actions of the State Department, and those critiques are now going to be used by Republicans for the next 4 months.  What I won't believe, or accept, is that Comey is acting under partisan principles or is incompetent because he made a decision that you and others that endorse your agenda don't like - for your own partisan reasons.

 

Well lets just look at what he said and let people make up their own minds.

Quote: 

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities.

 

Is there evidence that classified information was improperly stored? - YES

 

Is there evidence that classified information was improperly transmitted? - YES

 

Was classified information mishandled either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way? - YES

 

Answering those three questions from his own words makes it a felony.

 

Was classified information knowingly removed from appropriate systems or storage facilities? - Technically no because the system/storage facility was not an appropriate system.

---