Quote:Again, I never said it was racially motivated. It was said to not be racially motivated. Isn't it just as irresponsible, as you put it, to deem it not racially motivated without having the answers you just posed, or is it ok to say it's not racially motivated without in fact knowing one way or the other? If you could expound on the SFPD officer example I'm not sure what you're referring to. As for the NYPD officers, you're saying they were killed because the two perps felt their race was superior?


It's not entertainment. I don't get to have this honest of discourse about the subject. Really trying to understand your thought process.

LOL, I feel like I'm doing your Ethics homework! What is your point in all this back and forth? I don't mind having a discussion, but the middle of the road, round and round isn't getting anywhere.

 

Show me where the media or any protest group comes out screaming, "this was not racially motivated"! It is irresponsible for anyone to put any identifier or judgement out without facts.

 

I'm not going to type it all out here. Look up racist, homophobic San Fran police officer. As far as the NYPD killing, as it turns out I was incorrect in my recall of the situation. Turns out it was a revenge killing and can be thrown in the group discriminatory category, not racism. I'm sure the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) may have some information you would be interested in. They break down excessive force and police contact homicides by race and any other category you find interesting. 

---