Quote:He'll be crushed when he finds out you don't view him in the same light anymore. Now if he'd decided to recommend prosecution ...


 

Just because you would sell out doesn't mean he did. And you've not presented any information indicating he did. He spent four and a half hours explaining himself. But since you disagree (and I'm sure you're a legal and constitutional scholar) he's now sold out.

 

Is that how it works no? Anyone who disagrees is a sell out?

He laid out exactly why she should be prosecuted and then summarily concluded the equivalent of 'No one would really charge Hillary tho, I mean come on!' I believe what he said, I just think he made a choice that would personally benefit him by not recommending charges even though he had plenty of support to do so, and stated that if it was someone else they usually would be charged. It was a cop out. I don't know why he did it, but I suspect that it was politically expedient.

 

Edit: 'Just because I would sell out'? Where did I say that. If it were me, and I believed all the things he said prior to his conclusion, I would have recommended charging. I don't think that anyone who disagrees with me is a sell out, but I do think that someone who lays out all the evidence why Clinton should be charged, and then recommends something else is a sell-out. Its simple, if he came out, said she had no classified emails at the time, and that everything her campaign said is true, and he could see no reason to charge her, then his conclusion makes sense. But thats not what happened.

---