Quote:How is that so?

 

I was simply pointing out the fact that you couldn't seem to grasp that if someone has been pulled over for traffic violations that many times, it's probably a good indicator that the person doesn't follow directions or the law.

 

How exactly do you think that it "proves misconduct on the "pig's" (your words not mine) part?

Do I have to spell this out for you?

 

The murder victim held a concealed carry permit. He was not a violent individual or a hardened career criminal, despite what his previous traffic tickets would indicate to a mind like yours that's desperate to defend the pig as anything but. His being pulled over 32 times in his life and only blown to pieces in one of them strongly suggests that he has, on more than one occasion, told the officer that he was armed and followed instructions so as not to be killed. One can logically assume that he didn't just decide to throw caution to the wind on the 32nd time and try to reach into his pocket, pull out a gun and blow Squealer away. Wouldn't that be a logical conclusion? So assuming he did not decide that he had had it with these [BLEEP] cops on this [BLEEP] road, snap like a camel's back and try to go for a concealed weapon so he could get the first shot in, which is a pretty damn logical assumption, one would then have to ask: "Why did this 32nd pig decide to murder him in front of a child when the 31 previous cops were ok with him?"

 

So, why was the 32nd time the charm, Mr. "I was a cop once so I'm always right about such things"?

---