The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Alton Sterling - merged
|
Quote:If it's unclear as to whether someone is reaching into their pocket or not, doesn't the burden of proof call upon the shooter to prove that the victim was reaching for a visible weapon and was in a position that he could use it effectively? Why are we being told to prove that he wasn't? The people saying he wasn't aren't the ones rationalizing a murder. The burden of proof is always on the accuser (state). The cop here would have the benefit of reasonable doubt were he to face trial for this. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.