Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Khan says "jag fans have suffered long enough!"

(This post was last modified: 07-14-2016, 05:54 PM by The_Anchorman.)

Quote:Oh...

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://jacksonville.com/sports/football/jaguars/2015-12-11/story/cornerback-davon-house-turning-corner-jaguars-they-head'>http://jacksonville.com/sports/football/jaguars/2015-12-11/story/cornerback-davon-house-turning-corner-jaguars-they-head</a>


/roasted


Two fools in agreement don't make falsehoods into truth.


Perhaps in your "minds"... but certainly not in reality.
Fools, huh? You're quite the respectable debater, Pirk. I'm sorry, but some article that starts out by saying that House had a bad game against the tin horns is not worthy of you thinking that you won the arguement. Statistically, it was one of his best games, and like I said, he made 1 mistake, but other than that, he played a very good game.


I ran the numbers... Prior to benching House averaged 1.66 Passes Defended per game. After benching, 1.33. Prior to benching he averaged 3 tackles per game. After the benching he averaged 4.44 tackels per game. So yeah, that "light a fire" theory resulting in less passes defended and a slight uptick in tackles. Statistically, it doesn't look to have helped. So get out of here with that garbage.


Also, here's an article that looks at the benching from another point of view. <a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.examiner.com/article/davon-house-benched-by-jaguars'>http://www.examiner.com/article/davon-house-benched-by-jaguars</a>


Chances are, this move was made to try to motivate House, but that doesn’t mean it will. There are other players, especially on defense, that deserve to be benched before House. Hopefully, the move is not being made to make House the scapegoat. Yes, he gave up two scores, but he was not the only problem the Jaguars had on Sunday. The offense didn’t show well either, making a lot of mistakes including interceptions by Blake Bortles and dropped passes by the receiving core. Whatever the reason is, it should be a short-term experiment, because House deserves to start. He is making $24.5 million over the next four years, he needs to be out there earning that money.


And again, you ignore the fact that the stupid benching almost actually cost us the Buffalo game because he benched House for a god aweful CB. A benching that as I have shown via the stats did very little to improve his game play, because HE WAS ALREADY PLAYING AT A HIGH LEVEL!!!


LOL, nice try though, my good sir. Also, notice how one can disagree with a fellow poster and not come off like a total donkey? You may want to look into that. :-)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Khan says "jag fans have suffered long enough!" - by The_Anchorman - 07-14-2016, 05:53 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!