Just think about how shallow this thread topic is.  "Well he gave a slightly jumbled answer on why he picked a more traditional republican candidate to balance the ticket."  George H. W. Bush called supply side "VOODOO Economics."  It's the nature of the VP pick to balance out the ticket. 

 

As for the "it's no argument it's a deflection," Trump may not always sound like a Harvard debater, he just happens to be right 80-90% of the time.  He gives his speech on Immigration at his launch, Kate gets shot and now we know that the administration has been intentionally hiding stats on crime committed by illegals to avoid conservative immigration reform and border enforcement. 

 

He was right about the Macro-destabalization of the Invasion of Iraq, he was right about the pull out, he was right about taking the oil, he wouldn't have removed Quadafi, He was right about Brussels, as it turns out family members of terrorists do generally have some level of awarness or in the case of the Orlando Killer an active role in the planning of an attack.  The head of the FBI and the head of the CIA (both democratic appointees) say that he is spot on about the potential danger posed by refugee flows. 

 

That says nothing of his wheelhouse that is the economy and trade. 

 

If you think that it's smart to pick a woman who has been wrong about every major decision for the last 24 years because she can be coached through an interview on 60 minutes then be my guest.  Sometimes you get the government you deserve. 

---