Quote:MLK would disagree with what, the 1st Amendment? Or that violence is okay if you call it a "protest"?


Are BLM terrorists? Let's ask the Department of Homeland Security:

Any activity that involves an act that is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive to critical infrastructure or key resources, and is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any state or other subdivision of the United States and appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.


So, blocking an Interstate Highway is by definition a terrorist act.

Honestly, based on your postings here, there's a good chance you would've labeled MLK a terrorist too. Back in the day, it would've been hard for you to talk directly with him so he could explain why he was doing what he was doing. Today, you have the privilege of reaching out, using various forms of social media, to the true leadership of BLM to find out what their motives are instead of regurgitating the info from the very establishment they are leading the charge against. That's what you would do if you wanted to form your own objective opinion, but alas it's not about that. I mean it's not like all other forms of protest have been invoked ad nauseum with little to no effect. People are obviously fed up for no reason...

---