To cry foul now is certainly different. Whether or not we think we know something vs. having full proof evidence makes a huge difference. We can say Hillary is corrupt all day long, but having video of the corruption or a smoking gun changes things because it is more difficult to sweep it under the rug. Hearing about something and seeing it again, different. Lets take abuse for example. Hearing about someone who beat up his girlfriend people will have a reaction. Seeing the video of the beating and now you have people marching, protesting, etc... Hearing about police brutality you say yeah I know that happens, but... Seeing it though creates a completely different level of anger, emotion, etc...


I think what is worse though is seeing it and still being numb to it. That's when you've lost the fight.


Did Hillary state those things? No, she is a wolf in sheeps clothing. Why in the heck would she state that? Did she state that she was using the DNC to help her campaign and undermine Bernie? No. She also didn't state that she sent classified emails either. Not to mention all the emails she deleted. You can have the position of where is your proof, but there are plenty of signs, evidence of what she is. Just like there were plenty of signs, evidence of the DNC favoring Clinton. You state in one sentence everyone knows it has been this way for 30 years then say show you the proof of Clinton being this or that. Whatever I show you you will say it doesn't prove this or that. It just seems you are speaking from both sides. We have proof of the DNC trying to undermine Bernie and your response is so what, it's been going on for 30 years, had no effect, etc... If it had such little effect than why would they go through all of this and risk the fallout? What's the reward? If Bernie had hardly any chance than why risk it? Because they feared him. You don't do all that against someone that isn't a threat.

---