Stolen from Reddit:

 

<a class="" href='https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/4uvvsc/the_msm_just_created_a_catch22_re_hillarys_emails/'>The MSM Just Created A Catch-22 re: Hillary's Emails & Russia</a>

 

"As soon as Trump ended his Press Conference, the NY Times was publishing headlines saying Trump called on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails.

 


<div>
Well, Hillary Clinton's server is likely in an evidence locker in Quantico. I am going to go out on a limb and say that it is not plugged in and connected to the internet.

 

Anything that Russia releases would be something they already possess, meaning they would have had to have stolen information while Hillary's server was operational.

 

Here's the Catch-22. If Hillary Clinton is telling the truth and she only deleted emails pertaining to yoga lessons and Chelsea Clinton's wedding, then Russia hacking that information is purely a civil matter. It would be nothing but a foreign government hacking a private citizen.

 

But if Hillary Clinton lied... if she violated the Federal Records Act and destroyed government documents that she had an obligation to preserve... if she violated the Espionage Act and removed classified information from a secure environment, making it available for foreign hackers to steal... then anything Russia puts forward would be evidence of Hillary Clinton committing a crime.

 

So which is it, Mainstream Media? Is Hillary Clinton innocent of wrongdoing and Russia hacking her is largely a civil matter and one to be left to local law enforcement? Or is this prospect of Russia releasing Hillary's emails a threat to national security?

 

You can't have it both ways."


</div>

---