Quote:Why? Trump hasn't said much that I would view as "out of line", especially not over this Khan crap. Just because your end of the political spectrum or personal belief may perceive certain rhetoric or policy positions as "out of line" doesn't mean everyone else does. I love the fact that he talks (bad word) about progressive talking points, "heroes", policies, and dignitaries. This is how he won more primary votes than any other candidate in Republican history while running through 16 competitors. Instead of acting like Romney and being "above the fray" (and losing horribly as a result) he punches back against the DNC-controlled corrupt media and gets his constituency fired up.

 

The only thing I think he overstepped his bounds on was on the FBI/Apple iPhone investigation, and that was months ago and fairly minuscule. Other than that, I agree with his policies on immigration, trade, taxes, foreign policy, and national security.

How is saying we should ignore international human rights laws and the Geneva conventions and advocating torture and the killing of terrorists families not out of line? He has literally said he wants us to be more like the monsters we're fighting to beat them. None of that is out of line? Discriminating against an entire culture of people based off of the actions of a few is not out of line? I'm not the biggest Trump distractor and I can see some of the good in his RHETORIC (key word here) but to just pretend like this guy doesn't say some of the most vile stuff is pure denial.

 

Quote:I think most Trump supporters recognize the man's flaws.  They also recognize a Hillary victory would likely be the end of conservative politics in America.  She would continue Obama's policies of completely unregulated illegal immigration on the southern border and the importation of thousands of violent jihadists.  She is beholden to the most repressive regimes in the Middle East.  And she has absolutely no respect for the rule of law. 

 

Then there's the opportunity to pack the Supreme Court with 3 or 4 more progressive judges.

 

Bottom line, if Hillary is elected, conservatives will never win another election.  They will never win another Supreme Court case.  The attacks on the 1st and 2nd Amendment will be relentless. 

How would Hillary be the end of conservative politics in America exactly? News flash: Hillary is not a liberal! She's far closer to a neocon than anything else and her actions prove it! All the BS social reform she's peddling right now will be tossed out the window when she gets to the White House. Hillary is probably more of a "conservative" than Trump (who is in fact not a conservative himself at all). At the end of the day both of these politicians are narcissistic opportunists who will say anything to get elected. BOTH OF THEM. Trump is just as bad as Hillary. Neither of them care about conservatism or liberalism (especially the contemporary definition of those ideologies as they've both been misinterpreted and misconstrued by ignorants over the course of time). They care about getting in the White House to feed their egos and money interests. You really think Trump gives a damn about defending conservative principles? LOL. He was basically a common variety New York liberal not but 5 years ago when it was convenient. Now he's a "classic Christian conservative" since it's the best position to be aligned in to get him elected. Trump is a textbook politician and the fact people can't see that just because he hides behind the fact he has no voting record is incredible to me. Wake up people.

 

Also, Obama's policies of completely unregulated illegal immigration? Obama has deported a record number of immigrants, so how exactly is he supporting/complicit in and/or advocating for unlimited illegal immigration access? Just because Obama doesn't argue for a ridiculous wall doesn't mean he wants unregulated illegal immigrants.

 

I agree packing the Supreme Court with more SJW regressive left activist judges is not going to help matters (as far as this ridiculous SJW crusade is concerned), but Trump putting a neocon corporate schill judge in the court is not going to do anything to help either.

 

Quote:Of course he's out of line at times.. But at least he's no Crooked Hillary.. At least he wants to protect this country from the influx of immigrants from terroristic countries, whereas Hillary wants to open the flood gates.. And at least Trump didn't sell weapons to Syria (which in turn gave weapons to ISIS)


Trump may be a lot of things, but he's the lesser of two evils and the more necessary.

Where has Hillary said she wants to open the floodgates to Muslim immigrants? Just because she speaks in platitudes of "breaking down walls and borders" doesn't mean there is anything in her actual policy platform advocating for ramped up Middle Eastern immigration. Furthermore, Trump hasn't done anything, he has no political track record, so we have no idea how he would have handled anything! He was for the Iraq War initially but then he was against it when it became unpopular. Yet he goes around acting like he had immense foresight and was always against it. Lies! Hillary's foreign policy positions are disastrous and Trump's rhetoric is spot on, but that's all it is...rhetoric! He lies for a living! Why would he stop things that he profits off of? No matter how much you dislike Hillary her criticisms of him at the DNC were spot on. He makes his ties in China...for a guy that claims he's going to bring American jobs back, why didn't he do it for his own companies? He profits off of the way the system is now and it has made him rich...what in the world makes you think he is going to want to change it to the potential detriment to his own bottom line?

---