Quote:What qualifications does he possess that lead you to believe he would make a good president (aside from not being Hillary). I think you'll find answering this question honestly will leave you quite disappointed.

Trump was never my pick for the presidency, so I don't feel compelled to defend him on any level. 

 

What qualifications did Obama have to be president besides being a natural born citizen over the age of 35?  And what achievements has Clinton had that really qualify her to be the chief executive of anything, let alone the United States of America?  Her time in the Senate was lacking of any real legislation being proposed beyond renaming a couple of post offices.  Her tenure as Secretary of State was underwhelming at best, and potentially created a more dangerous environment with hot spots around the globe.  All the while, she was lining her pockets by selling access through her family slush fund, the Clinton Foundation.

 

The one area where Trump actually has the upper hand over Clinton is that he has actually run something.  His business acumen is certainly loaded with questionable stuff, but he does know how to surround himself with people who are more than competent to do the jobs they're tasked with.  There are certain issues where I think Trump is right, and many where I totally disagree with his views.  For me, in order for him to get my vote, I have to make the decision as to how much value I place on those issues where I agree with him.  There are some pretty big issues where I don't. 

 

We are faced with two very flawed candidates.  Neither is really deserving of the office, but that's all we've got.  A vote for Trump puts a stake in the heart of the perpetuation of the Clinton crime syndicate, and a vote for Clinton almost guarantees a 1 term presidency for Trump.  I'm not thrilled about that choice, but we've got to end this dynastic entitlement mentality of families like the Clintons and Bushes. 

---