Quote:What she and the rest of her party wants is permanent control.  Despotism where they can eliminate opposing voices.

 

They desire to flood the country with D voters to accomplish this.  Once completed, they'll have established their perpetual "rule."

 

Nothing more, nothing less than securing, then abusing a permanency of power.

 

And the useful idiots continue to blindly comply... while whistling past the graveyard...

 

Truer words could not have been said on this forum.  I'm not really "pro-Trump", I'm more "anti-Hillary".  If Trump would keep his pie-hole shut and allow Hillary to speak, he wins in a landslide.

 

That being said, remember what Valerie Jarrett said when Obama was elected.  She was one of his chief advisers and her exact quote was "It is important that President-elect Obama is prepared to really take power and be ready to rule day one."  The thing is, the office of President isn't about ruling, it's about leadership.

 

So what has happened since 2008?  We now have "free speech zones" to eliminate opposing voices.  We had "ruler-ship" rather than "leadership" when the democrat congress rammed through Obamacare and it was signed into law by "his majesty".  The abuse of power has come from the many "executive orders" initiated by Obama when Congress would not pass legislation that he wanted.  The democrat party pretty much ensured the "coronation" of Hillary in the primary.

 

People are always calling for change and a shakeup of the political parties.  Donald Trump has accomplished that on the Republican side with many in the establishment either questioning or outright saying that they are against him.  Meanwhile on the Democrat side, it's "politics as usual" with the "coronation" of Hillary.  While both sides attempted to stop it, the Republican was out in the open about it.  Meanwhile the Democrat side was exposed for trying to do it secretly.

 

The bottom line is Trump sometimes runs his mouth more than he should.  I find it interesting that Hillary hasn't commented on any of the recent medial created "scandal" and instead relies on "his majesty" (Obama) to remark on it at a press conference regarding TPP.

---