Quote:There explanation was basically, it is just coincidental. I read the explanation and your objectivity is obviously skewed. What they have not answered is why they sent the money in secret in the manner they did without disclosing it? If it is all to do about nothing then why is the press secretary saying "why is that relevant?" And this has been the problem with the Obama regime. The most transparent Government which has been the least transparent.


The American people have a right to know how the money was paid, how they have spent the money (Iran) and why they sent $400 million in secret. There's still no explanation and they never disclosed it. If there is nothing to it that's fine, but they should answer questions or just be more forthcoming from the get go.


The timing is suspicious and the secrecy only adds to it. The not answering as to why adds fuel to the fire. You sure your being objective?

 

I'm trying to be objective.  I think the explainations seem valid.  They are not "fishy" as JIB would have you believe...  We did not pay a ransom to free those hostages...  I urge you to do a little more research.  The money that was originally Irans to begin with was frozen back in 1979...  

 

Perhaps you should check your objectivity?

---