Quote:Sorry my 10 year old isn't tough enough for you [BAD WORD REMOVED].She is half Jewish and was scared random people wanted to burn her and her mother. She wasn't supposed to see the comments section, but hey.. there's nothing wrong with saying "Burn the Jews" at an American presidential rally, right? Totally acceptable. She should toughen up. Moron.

 

So, it's completely unthinkable that a comment posted ONLINE during a streaming of a live event that would be considered offensive is a reflection of the crowds who attend the event, and the candidate they're there to see, and not some anonymous internet troll looking to get a reaction?  Perhaps by a Clinton staffer who is just trying to perpetuate a myth that you've eagerly lapped up like a good little lemming?

 

Candidates can't be held accountable for what some troll does on a website, or even at their rallies.  Especially when it's been made perfectly clear that there are Soros funded leftist groups who have made it abundantly clear that they will be disrupting every Trump rally between now and election day.  You want to believe that this is a reflection of the candidate because you've made up your mind and reinserted your head in the orifice that best insulates you from any alternate possibility.

 

I'm sorry your daughter had to see the comments.  Knowing how those internet comments work, and how you're bound to get offensive or inappropriate content in them during something like this, I probably would have chosen NOT to let my 10 year old daughter watch the stream, but that's just me.

 

Quote:So what you're saying is everything I posted was accurate and we should rehash stories about an ex-president who is not up for election. From a policy perspective, Hillary comes out way ahead. Trump has a long history of insulting, demeaning and objectifying women. Which is why he is getting killed in that demographic.

 

Hillary Clinton portrays herself as a champion for women.  What her husband did to degrade women and objectify them, and then her subsequent actions to destroy the women who were telling the truth about their encounters goes right to the heart of her issues with women.  You have to ignore the fact that she trashed sexual assault victims in order to protect her husband.  Rather than being an actual champion for women, she became an enabler for a sexual predator, all for political expediency.  You don't care about that with a 10 year old daughter, but you will feign offense at something an Internet troll says and pin that to the candidate.  You're a hypocrite.

 

Quote:Okay.. Except it is not random. It is rampant. This happens at every stop on his campaign trail. Can you name ANY other instance in politics where this has happened or was deemed remotely acceptable? Neo-Nazis openly support him and when asked to condemn them he wouldn't. I have NEVER seen anything like this in my lifetime.

 

Again, you say this happens at every stop on his campaign trail.  That trail came through Jacksonville and Daytona a couple of days ago, and I don't recall hearing anything of the sort. 

 

You act like there aren't offensive groups helping to fund Clinton's extravagant lifestyle.  Go look at the list of nation states that have donated MILLIONS to her family slush fund with the intent of gaining access to the Oval Office, or to her during her tenure as Secretary of State.  The champion for women has taken MILLIONS from nations who treat women like property, and she's been very careful NOT to condemn their actions.  Why is that?  Why doesn't that bother you?  That's a rhetorical question.  You're a mind-numbed Hill-o-bot.  I know the answer.

 

Quote:The fact that it is so rampant means it actually IS a reflection of the candidate.

 

No, it's not actually, especially when the odds of it being someone supporting Clinton trying to create the perception that you so eagerly lap up like a good little lemming are pretty high.

---