Quote:FBT, definitely agree on that. The message has been engrained into the party and it is an effective one. Even if there is evidence everything is right wing conspiracy. And they have used this tactic during Bill's Presidency. Hillary said the same thing during Lewonski scandal which is the one thing she was unable to cover up. Well that and the emails.


Also, those who constantly bash the Benghazi investigation seem to miss some major points. One is the embassy requested several times they need more security from people (American) to fence/gate. They told the State Department so many times how inadequate the facilities were. Time after time after time. Hillary may not have done anything illegal, but the blood is on her hands. And again, Dems don't seem to care and call it right wing conspiracy. The 2nd is her email server. That came from the investigation. Also, she was warned several times about it until the guy whose name I forgot told the other person don't ever call about it again. Who do you think that order came from?


For so much to be ignored, you can only tie it to one thing. Political bias.

What has become clear over the years is that the media narrative is driven by what they're told to report by their progressive icons. 


Case in point. 

 

Obama gives a press conference at the Pentagon where the focus is on the money sent to Iran.  When he finished his statement, the first question that came his way was about his prior comments that Trump is not qualified to be the president, asking if he could expand on those comments.

 

Hillary Clinton met with a minority group of journalists today, gave a speech filled with the same empty rhetoric and platitudes that are boilerplate, and then decided to take some questions that were fed to her through a moderator.  To her credit, the moderator did ask about the previous comments about Hillary saying Comey had exonerated her, and that he made a statement saying she was truthful in all of her answers to the FBI.  Hillary went on this meandering, rambling response filled with all sorts of qualifiers and legalese that is vintage Clinton speak, saying that during the interview with Fox News Channel's Chris Wallace this past Sunday where she made the claim that has been debunked all over the media subsequently, they must have been speaking past each other and that Wallace must have misunderstood her response.  It's funny because apparently Hillary is just so smart that people have trouble grasping her points based on this comment.  It's a similar deflection to the one that she made when talking about the parents of the Benghazi 4 who said she told them while standing over the caskets of their loved ones that their death was caused by a video.  Her response when asked about that recently was that they must have had a problem recollecting what she said because she never made any such reference.  Only problem is, she also said it from the podium with Obama standing right there on camera. 

 

In the incident with journalists today, there was no follow up.  I guess her non-answer answer was adequate to satisfy the least curious press corps in the history of the nation.

 

Meanwhile, Trump said something that offended someone, and the media will no doubt fixate on that and trying to turn that into yet another campaign crisis.  It's getting comical how slanted this has been, and the media isn't even bothering to try to mask it any more.  They're almost completely in the bag for Clinton, and they'll craft whatever narrative they feel is necessary to assure she brings it home in November.  It's been that way since she announced last year.  They colluded with the campaign, as evidenced in the DNC emails that were leaked.  There are no more Woodward and Bernsteins out there looking to actually break a real news story.  Now it's about crafting a narrative to prop their person up and trash the opposition. 

---