Quote:Talk about twisting the conversation to fit your specific view!!


Don't try to tell me the "context" of his speech, I'm reading the man's actual words. Notice that nowhere in his speech does he talk about Trump "kicking out Muslims, "Mexicans", illegals and persecuting minority group". He does however, talk about Muslims being banned FROM the country. Disrespecting minorities, woman, and judges might make him a huge feminine hygiene product, it's not against the law.

So using Mr. Khan's speech, the actual one, not your pretend version of what he said, tell me who is left in it that would need "liberty and equal protection of law".

 

 


Sorry, bunnie, but context is key.  You know, cuz without it the whole discussion is meaningless.  For instance, you ignoring my 3rd paragraph reduces my post to complete nonsense.  I'll restate it for ya:

 

The context of Mr. Khans speech goes mainly into the concern of kicking out Muslims, "Mexicans", illegals, and persecuting minority groups.  The extrapolation to closing boarders to religious classes may very well be argued as Constitutional or Un-Constitutional---  But it clearly is anti-American if you believe in liberty and equal (edited for accuracy) process under law...

 

I've bolded the part I think is the most important. The concept of liberty and equal process of law is the foundation of Mr. Khans attack on trump.  As I mentioned in my original post, and what I'm pointing out to you again here, is that the context is important.  The offense that minorities feel about trump is the stances he takes in which he's looking to exile the current minorities based on nationality (mexicans), race (hispanics), or religion (muslims). 

 

Also, as I pointed out which you failed to recognize as you took your high horse for a ride, is that the Constitutionality of banning immigrants before they enter the USA may be argued, but the fact remains that it's clearly anti-American.  Would you not agree?  Or does the concept of the Statue of Liberty no longer apply?  Or do they only apply to fair skinned Anglo-Saxon Europeans?  

 

These are the points Mr. Khan is making.  And it is important to understand them as a whole as we read his words.  Which I also did.  And is why I focused on his mentioning of "Liberty" and "Equal protection under law".

---