Quote:The point you seem to be missing, because you refuse to read, is the fact he wasn't expressing his own personal opinion on Bradley, but rather how the organization views him.

 

This positive view by the organization is supported by the statements they have publicly released about Bradley and the fact that they signed him to an extension.

 

We understand your dislike for Bradley, but your response to what was said by the poster was nothing more than shooting the messenger.

 

The postive view they say they have means nothing at all. 

 

Khan said he was absolutely sure hiring Mularkey was the right choice

Didn't Coughlin say to Weaver that Gene Smith was the right man to turn the franchise around? And didn't Weaver say pretty much the same thing to Khan?

 

We all know why they gave Bradley an extension, let's not pretend they gave it to him because they think he is a good coach, if that was the case why not give 4 more years instead?

 

You really expect a franchise to say something like "we know our HC is incompetent but we are still gonna give him one more year" or something like that?

 

Again, all the garbage he posted is the same silly thing that a lot of people here have posted about JDR, Mularkey, Gene Smith etc. You have the right to get excited about what CALDWELL has done, but Bradley has done nothing, I am pretty sure the guy will never be anything more than a mediocre HC.

---