The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Overanalyzing the Soft Spot
|
Quote:One thing, thats is a bad call with a 5 wr set. Should of ran a dime or a quarterI would rather keep the Nickel but change out a couple players. Jack for Poz, Peyton for Cyp, Gipson for Peyton. I'll add in that I'd want to play a quarters/cover 4 type d and deny anything deep. Rely on solid tackling to stop them from getting the first. At least for the 3rd and 10 one. Id consider calling a time out if I saw them come out in basically the same formation the very next play.
Go Jags!
*To stay up for atleast 2 years 3/6/17 2016 draft players I think will be good
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.