Quote: 

<div>
"That historical deference to the political branches, says Volokh, a First Amendment expert, suggests “from a constitutional perspective, it may well be that Muslims could be excluded, just like people could be excluded based on their speech and political opinions, and historically their race."

 



He cautions "those cases are pretty old, so it’s not clear what the Supreme Court today would authorize.” Applying a travel ban to returning U.S. citizens who are Muslims would clearly be unconstitutional, he says, and Trump’s idea likely would require an act of Congress.


 

Stephen Yale-Loehr, who teaches immigration law at Cornell Law School, says it's unclear if courts would strike down a ban on Muslim immigrants."


 

In other words, they have no idea, it has historical precedence, and it would only apply to Muslims that were already citizens.

 

</div>

 

THAT's what I've been saying!  I'm glad we are in agreement!  Thank you! 

 

As I said, I could see a very good case that would strike down the ban as un-Constitutional.  Of course trump supporters would see it the other way.  But it's not clear cut, as you have seen for yourself.  I knew there was a reason I liked you, JW.

 

Now will you get Bunnie on board please?

---