Quote:Couldn't tell.. are you admitting I did not try to discredit them?


The reason I posted to that link was to show how people will run with what they say as if it is verified regardless of whether or not it actually is. Yes they were trolling. Yes it was discovered to be trolling. But for a period of time it was perceived as fact. And to just blindly believe everything someone says is dangerous. You say people aren't. But you clearly do.

Oh, you're doing your part as a good little lemming to lay the groundwork to discredit the emails.  Don't try to pretend otherwise. 

 

No, I don't blindly believe anything, but, based on the track record of the source, the odds of them not being credible is pretty much nil.  I fully expect the emails to be scrutinized almost as much as any republican candidate since they involve potential damaging/incriminating info on the corrupt pantsuit princess.  If these emails were leaked about Donald Trump, the media wouldn't scrutinize them one iota.  They'd breathlessly scan them for potential scandals and break as quickly as possible with the news.  Since it's Clinton, they'll dig deep to make sure there's nothing fabricated in the release, and when that doesn't provide what they would perceive to be positive results, they'll just ignore them all together with the standard response:

 

---