Quote:He didn't give the money to the red cross. But to an anti gay church.


Not a good look.


If he gave it to the red cross, we could be confident that it would be used to help victims.


It's not a good look. The funds are now going to be dispersed in a way that church wants to disperse them. It's pretty obvious, and a bad move politically.


Also, I started this thread, and the topic is how this looks from a politics stand point. If you want to talk about your point, I'd be happy to.


Just wanted to remind you way I'm focused on the optics of it.

 

You're throwing a fit about money that is most likely going toward a rebuilding effort... that's stupid

 

From Snopes (from the church):

 

Orientation for volunteers working with Samaritan’s Purse will be at 7:30 in the morning. If you can, please volunteer, either with Samaritan’s Purse or GSBC. We need help with a number of activities and projects that we are managing related to the relief effort.

---