Quote:Did you pay any attention to our opponents and their disasters at QB and OL last season? Average coaching would have had us around average on defense against the schedule we faced. Instead we were 31st. 31st!


 

We should have won the 1st Houston game (Babich should have been fired immediately after that). We also should have won the second tacks game and the Bucs game. Any competent defensive coordinator would have held the opponents to under 20 points in those three games.


 

That's three. There were also a few other close games where the defense failed, such as the first clots game.


 

And yes, Gus coaching the Pats would have them at 8-8, especially if he was responsible for player development for the previous two years.

Vague examples at best. So, we're in a shoot out with the Bucs and can't tackle Martin, and Gus could fix that how exactly?

 

I still don't see how any of the examples given are won with "better coaching". 

 

There are a few others we did win that we could have not won.

What exactly is the point in the "almosts"? 


I'm asking for proof in this insane idea that coaching matters enough for 4 wins.

 

Stupidest thing I've heard since 'bae'.

---