Anchorman is acting like he really did extensive research before coming to a conclusion.  He's simply taking the theories face value and believing them.  That's how these arguments usually go.  They don't actually present evidence other than saying, "Hey, everybody believes it."  Well then, it must be true.

 

He doesn't even seem to get the problem at hand here.  If it was cut and dry, SO EASY to prove climate change is man-caused, then the evidence could be presented during a debate in class and be done with it.  The problem is the evidence isn't all that convincing and there are counter arguments to be had.  This is a university where critical thought is supposed to be encouraged.  Instead what's pushed here is dogma.

---