Quote:Again, I'll wait to see the facts. I'm not calling Assange a liar. I'm not calling Rand Paul a liar. But I'm not just gonna take thier word for it.


If they have all these facts, why haven't they provided said facts?


LOL, you want to just take rumors and "well I know for a fact" from politicians (Paul is part of the government by the way, so you're being just as clueless, aren't you) and some web-page owner as gospel.


You have nothing but hearsay, which is not substantial. And you know it. That's why you're so frustrated. That's why you're attacking my intelligence. You know that if I was making spurious accusations against trump you'd ask for facts.


There's no difference here. You have no proof. And you know it.


The weapons ISIS has that originated from the USA have been explained in a way that does not paint Obama or Clinton as traitors. Unless you have actual proof otherwise, you're just spreading rumors like an immature 13 year old. Be a grown up, Deal with the reality. The reality is you got nothing.


Now when Assange provides proof. You can come here and tell us all we should have believed you, and Assange, and Rand earlier. That's fine. But I'd like proof before I jump to any conclusions. That's fair, isn't it?

There are so many reports on the ground from people that it's virtually impossible that it's not true. What our government will do however is claim negligence. Its not negligence. At the very least it's wreckless, but youd have to be a fool to not see it's wreckless by design.


Again, this isn't Joe Website reports. These are big time publications reporting on this.


Frustrated?! Damn right and it's not because I don't have "proof". Its because I know it's true.

---