Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Hillary Clinton's Negligent Control of Classified Information

#71

Quote:I agree with your first statement.


However, Hillary did not lie to Congress. The fbi director under oath said she did not lie. She lied\misled the public, which Powell has just been caught doing as well...
 

That's not true.  She said she turned over all her e-mail, she signed a document under penalty of perjury that she turned over her e-mail and they found 2500 work related emails that were not surrendered, and now we have uncovered 15000 more that were not turned over.  This was not included in the original FBI investigation because the criminal referral was for the mishandling of classified information and they required a separate criminal referral to investigate perjury, which since has been issued by the house of representatives. 

 

As for lying to the FBI we now know that she a.) just kept repeating I don't recall and b.) she wasn't pressed. 

 

In this instance, any impartial prosecutor would draw a negative inference from the destruction of evidence (after federal subpoena, another felony) and move forward under the letter of the statute that required gross negligence in the absence of adjudicated criminal intent (Comey Directly testified to extreme carelessness: the legal definition of Gross Negligence)  and not try to rewrite the statute to let her off the hook. 

 

If you want to say that Trump is a racist, that's your prerogative, if you want to say that you think he's a bully, that's your prerogative, if you want to say you just don't like the guy, that's your prerogative, if you say that you don't like my necktie, that's your prerogative, but don't tell me that there is any other explanation than the fact that this woman is the wife of a former president.  If this was someone serving as SOS that had just been a former governor she would be in jail. 

 

This is indefensible, as someone who has had friends go to jail for record keeping requirements this is a slap in the face to every law abiding citizen in this country.  Further defense of this mess is nothing less than intellectual dishonesty at a level I would have never thought possible. 

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Hillary Clinton's Negligent Control of Classified Information - by jj82284 - 09-08-2016, 11:37 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!