Quote:Would you say that Republicans have consistently been for human rights given history?  It's not just the Republicans from 1860, but also Republicans as recently as 1965.  I could give more modern examples if you want.

 

My point is that to say the Republican party is "anti-civil rights" is pretty much a false statement.

I did not say the Republican party is "anti-civil rights".

 

Would I say they have been consistent? No. I, in fact said the opposite as the opposite is true. They have not been consistent considering the last event you gave was the precursor to the Southern Strategy employed by Republicans. That's not consistent at all. 

---