Quote:The cop gets to stand trial.  The victim didn't...  But yes.  That's what I've been saying this entire thread...  Just to repeat what I asked Winger, I'd like your input on this as well...

 

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">When I tried to make the distinction that pigs are different than Law Enforcement Officers, it is lost on JIB and others.

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"> 

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Why is it that I cannot use the term pig for a cop that is corrupt and is using excessive force on a man that didn't deserve to die, and yet you can get away with the distinction of rioters and looters?

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"> 

<p style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Seems unfair and kinda biased, don't you think?

 

You can use whatever term you want on them, but saying she is corrupt and used excessive force could be proven wrong following an investigation. You want to believe those things are true, but they could just as easily be proven false.

 

As for rioters, we have a ton of evidence of their destruction based on the numerous media coverage, cameras everywhere, eye witnesses, and more. The shooting didn't have nearly this much clarity.  They really aren't comparable.

---