Quote:So let me try to understand you because your vitriol is quite frankly alarming and over the top.  You do know what manslaughter means right? Here I will help you just in case: "the crime of killing a human being without malice aforethought, or otherwise in circumstances not amounting to murder."  I am not condoning her actions, she was in over her head and in hindsight should not have been wearing the uniform.  Your ire however is way over the top.  I thought you liberals were compassionate and looked at all sides.  Perhaps not.  

 

What side am I not looking at.  Did she not kill an unarmed man?  Did she not get charged with manslaughter.

 

As an American, I beleive in the constitution and I prefer to look at the facts.  I'm pointing out facts.  Sorry that your side of the arguement has to deal with a stupid cop that is terrible at her job.  But the fact remains.  She killed an unarmed man.  He was innocent until proven guilty of whatever he was pulled over for and didn't deserve to die.

 

She's standing trail for manslaughter.  Based on the video tape, the state of Oklahoma feels there's enough evidence to charge her with manslaughter which carries a 4 year minimum sentance if convicted.

 

What's vitriolic about those facts?

 

By the way, calling black protesters animals and saying they are terrorists is pretty vitriolic as well.  But it's cool to demagogue blacks, right?  Who cares about those animals.

---