Quote:Every post I have made on this from the time the definition of the word "let" was introduced has been about the false argument that a person cannot be given a blanket excuse that since they said an act was consensual it must be so. From that post pages ago, my argument has never been about Trump, whether he actually did it, whether he was joking or anything else. Go back and see for yourself. I have been saying the same thing a hundred ways. You and others have been coming in and making this an argument about Trump's guilt, intention or innocence and I have been consistently fighting against the notion a person cannot be automatically given a free pass simply because they say a woman let them do something. It does not matter if we are talking about this incident or a person on trial for rape. You cannot simply draw a conclusion about a situation based on one person's account of an event. Trump was the basis of an argument, "he says they let him so it must not have been a big deal." I could care less about him. I care that an argument is made that a guy's account is all that is needed to make a judgment of what was or was not a consensual event without even taking a moment to get any details. A blanket excuse was made ..because Trump.. that defies logic and I rightfully called it out as bull manure. You agreed with the only point I was ever trying to make. So how is that getting destroyed in a debate? I cannot help if you were arguing about something different.

That's not what Bunnie said though as she has already pointed out.


Listen to yourself man.


"I care that an argument is made that a guy's account is all that is needed to make a judgment of what was or was not a consensual event without even taking a moment to get any details."


That's what this whole was thread has been about. You can't just take what Bunnie said out of context as it was completely to do with what Trump said.


I must add a stage 6: Tries to claim we are arguing about different points. You did this in the homosexuality thread too before agreeing with me.


All I said was that there is a small possibility that a man/women could be lieing when they say something. That is common knowledge and a universal truth.


You have just been posting vague statements and saying it isn't about Trump whilst constantly referring back to a post made about Trump in a thread about Trump.


Or is your whole argument based on the semantics of you not understanding someones view? That's step 4 I believe.

---