Quote:Pinochet, lol.  Trump didn't indicate that she would be in jail because he is big and bad and all his political opponents need to be locked up.  He said she would be in jail because she demonstorably violated the espionage act and the freedom of information acts record keeping requirements. 

 

When you destroy evidence that is under subpoena, that's a crime.  When you are legally required to affirmatively preserve your work related emails and devices and you don't, that's a crime.  When you sign an exit document stating that you surrendered all your work related emails and then we discover thousands more that you didn't turn over (as required by law) that's perjury.  In this case the list goes on.

 

He wasn't threatening political retaliation, he was affirmatively stating a commitment to enforce the law. 

 

In reality, the people who purport that just because Mrs. Clinton is seeking elected office, or that her husband is a former president, that she should somehow be held immune from ANY wrong doing are advocating a banana republic.  not those who are simply advocating the simple rule of law.