Quote:Actually, you can do exactly that. The media collluded with the democrats and the Clinton campaign to assure the republicans nominated the most beatable candidate to go up against Clinton. That's why they gave him as much free coverage as possible while simultaneously taking out any viable republicans who might threaten her coronation. Once they completed their mandate and Trump was the nominee, the machine shifted gears and went about the business of taking Trump out.


They didn't give him all that free press because they liked him. It was a complete setup from the start.

Welcome to American politics since 1776.


It's ridiculous for him to take the stance because the race isn't even going to be that close. I'll give you this, if it comes down to 500 votes as it did in 2000, he has every right to not concede.


But his supporters are not completely ignorant and they know exactly what he meant. He wasn't talking about a close election. He was upping by ante on his ridiculous and stupid claims that the United States national election is somehow rigged. Personally I think you should be locked up for trying to incite a riot.


and to compare Abraham Lincoln in 1860 election shows that most people don't know history. Either Hillary or Donald Trump both would win with a larger popular vote percentage.

---