Quote:Welcome to American politics since 1776.


It's ridiculous for him to take the stance because the race isn't even going to be that close. I'll give you this, if it comes down to 500 votes as it did in 2000, he has every right to not concede.


But his supporters are not completely ignorant and they know exactly what he meant. He wasn't talking about a close election. He was upping by ante on his ridiculous and stupid claims that the United States national election is somehow rigged. Personally I think you should be locked up for trying to incite a riot.


and to compare Abraham Lincoln in 1860 election shows that most people don't know history. Either Hillary or Donald Trump both would win with a larger popular vote percentage.

 

This race is going to be much closer than you wishful proggies think.  I don't think he wins, but it's not going to be this electoral or popular landslide like you pant suit worshipers would prefer. 

 

This whole issue is being spun up by the same liberals who cheered on Al Gore in 2000, and who never considered Bush a legitimately elected president.  They're singing a different tune today, faking outrage over Trump's comments because that's what the spoon fed Clinton playbook requires, so I understand why you and the usual suspects are frothing at the bit over this today.  That's what you lemmings are being told to do, and you're obedient little minions. 

 

I have zero doubt that if the election results are clear next month, Trump won't launch lawyers into swing states looking for hanging chads and magically appearing ballots that were previously stored next to the email server in Clinton's basement bathroom.  He'll concede.  Conceding in October is pointless, rendering this entire argument pointless as well. 

---