Quote:So if you forget to sign it then you are given a chance to get it corrected?But if someone feels they don't match it isn't?


Not voter fraud. But it is voter disenfranchisement.


Sounds like a judge said no to that interpretation of the law.

 

Do you not see the difference?  Missing a signature is a simple mistake.  Two different signatures is potentially voter fraud.  

 

Thank God one of your progressive judges heard the case. He didn't say no to the interpretation of the law.  He simply decided to rewrite it to satisfy his master's wishes.  

 

Clearly, this type of "disenfranchisement" only happens to democrats who seem to find every possible way to screw up voting.  It's funny how democrats brought the suit, implying that their own voters are too incapable of signing a document twice with consistent signatures.  In the past, they've sued because ballots were too confusing, or because they couldn't punch a hole through a piece of paper.  In essence, the democrat party thinks their supporters are too stupid, and too weak to vote effectively.  On this, we agree.

---