Quote:Most people use a teams past reputation to determine if they are "bad", and not their current success. We arguably haven't even played a good team yet.

 

During preseason, everyone said Green Bay is a good team and our chances of winning (or at least keeping it close) are based on roster changes in Jacksonville. The Packers, as usual, stayed mostly intact, and everyone expected to see a lot of improvement - especially on offense - for valid reasons. It was not a misconception based on Green Bay's historical reputation making people overrate the Packers, but simply knowing all the facts that, on paper, show they are going to be very good this season. It is not arguable that we have played against no good teams yet because of this. We can debate how good or bad the Ravens are, but definitely not the Packers.

---