Quote:Each case is different and has a ton of variables to be taken into consideration. Its impossible to declare someone guilty of a crime unless you have concrete facts and evidence, an accusation is not enough.


Also you have to consider that there are many Trump supporters on this board and naturally they would be inclined to side with him withput facts or evidence to back up the claims. In the same way that Clinton supporters believe Bill is innocent from his sexual assault allegations.


So when you say


"Based on the logic of this message board, I assume people will say all of the other coeds who allege this guy attacked, groped or molested them in some way are making it up."


Its just a really lazy assumption without any evidence behind it. Every case is different and nobody should be accused of being guilty or innocent until the facts and evidence actually are verified.

How can you say it's impossible to declare someone guilty of a crime without concrete facts when I have presented you with Brian Banks as an example of just that.


Of course every case is different, but the way you'd hear some on this board talk, the men accused of sexual assault or rape are the victims. Nobody replied to my question about the accusations against Clarence Thomas which just came to light. What is the expiration date on the credibility of the accuser after the alleged event was said to have taken place? A week? A year? A decade?

---