Quote:I personally am not a big fan of Vick, was just giving examples of what veteran routes we could go down if taking one of the QBs when our draft slot comes up isnt the best option.

 

Given the obvious high level of coaching we have in the organisation even bringing Vick in would be a massive improvement over Henne if he can stay fit. He's obviously had quite a bit of success in the past. Cutler though would be a better fit I think for the offence.

 

I'm probably alone in thinking this, but with the amount of young players in the team, perhaps having a QB thats been in the league a while (but also has some degree of talent) wouldnt be a disaster. 

 

your not alone, i would like to see a more established qb bed in the line especially if we go rookies at centre and guard

then patzor and joeckel at tackle with uche the lone vet.

That worries me especially with inexperience under centre.

 

I would prefer us to take a more pro ready qb like bridgewater, mcarron or fales than your "high ceiling" qbs like bortles or mettenberger

not a fan of carr at all,

 

(that being said i wish we had the luxury of a vet qb and being able to sit bortles for a season, I like the kid alot he has that luck style bravery,  has a lovely arm, great presence and doesn't stare down his read too badly, but he trusts his arm too much and i reckon he needs time to develop it)

 

i'm just not seeing a vet guy i want on my team in the free agency or for a pick i'm willing to sacrifice.

Cousins for a second or higher, puts a bad taste in my throat, not sure why, good qb but thats alot to spend

,

vick will be out half the season as is his pattern, cutler is eratic and i don't think the bears will let mccown go as well as cutler. If we got him for nothing josh mccown would be someone I would be happy to put in for a season. older guy, nice arm would be happy to sign a one year contract and i think would be a solid mentor for a rookie, but then henne knows the system will be cheap and has more years in him.

---