Quote:There was no implication of guilt, except you of Trump, and that's more than an implication. No one on here has been saying anything about Trump or Clinton regarding these allegations except for when you bring them up, so no one is saying you should be outraged against one and not the other, again, except for you. And like I said, and I'm sure most feel the same a I do, it's easy to be skeptical when its just a civil suit that's filed.


I have a hard time believing that this 13 was supposedly so scared for her life and those of her family that she didn't go to the police about it, even as an adult, but she's suddenly now so emboldened when it comes with the potential a lot of zeros on a check. I'd have a hard time believing it no matter who was accused in these same circumstances, not just Trump.

The implication is I should be outraged at Clinton's accusation. Should there be no outrage at the Trump accusation as well? You are skeptical that there is only a civil suit. Could there be a statute of limitations preventing the accuser of pressing criminal charges? Your second paragraph follows the same sad narrative many accusers face. Blaming or discrediting the victim. You really can't conceive of a 13 year old girl being genuinely petrified by powerful men who have just attacked them? I find that easy to believe having known women who were attacked in their youth and threatened to keep their silence. There's no chance she or any of the other accusers who are not seeking money could possibly be telling the truth. Because none of Trump's actions, words or associates lend credibility to the allegations.

---