Quote:The implication is I should be outraged at Clinton's accusation. Should there be no outrage at the Trump accusation as well? You are skeptical that there is only a civil suit. Could there be a statute of limitations preventing the accuser of pressing criminal charges? Your second paragraph follows the same sad narrative many accusers face. Blaming or discrediting the victim. You really can't conceive of a 13 year old girl being genuinely petrified by powerful men who have just attacked them? I find that easy to believe having known women who were attacked in their youth and threatened to keep their silence. There's no chance she or any of the other accusers who are not seeking money could possibly be telling the truth. Because none of Trump's actions, words or associates lend credibility to the allegations.

Omg...are you really as dense as you make it seem?? Asking you why you're not outraged about Clinton does in no way suggest that you shouldn't be outraged over Trump, it's asking you why you're outraged over one and not the other!! Shouldn't you be worried about those children too, because you only seem worried about the one accusing Trump. Selective outrage at its finest.

---