Quote:No. They deserve a trial for the facts to be presented. Your reaction is phony however.

If your neighbor or co worker was accused of raping a 13 year old in addition to allegations of sexual assault on multiple other women, you are full of [BAD WORD REMOVED] if your reaction would simply to say, "Bummer." Or to even react by saying, "hmm.. let's try to tear down the accuser and point out every facet that could be false."

If this were someone you were in regular contact with, your first reaction would be shock/outrage and your following reaction would be repulsion or at a minimum, mild precaution. If you want to stick to this line of bull that you would immediately take a stance where you would maintain Spock-like even keel of extreme reason, you are lying. If this was ANYONE you actually knew, being simply accused of the action would be enough for you to question everything you know about that person. If it were someone you knew who was accused by multiple women, you would convince yourself the person had to be guilty for at least some of it. If you maintain this would not be the case, I will call you a sociopath or an outright liar.

But with Trump, it's different. Riiight..

If that person was arrested for it, or caught red handed at it, yes, I would question it and be shocked about it. But like I've already said, if the hint of being a child molester comes after 20 years and only with a civil suit, then I'd be skeptical of that too, even if that person was you who was being accused.


And I couldn't care less if you call me a liar, a sociopath, a racist, a fascist, or worse than Hitler, or anything else you've called me, alluded to, or even thought about me. It's your "go to" move, and has absolutely no effect on me.

---