Quote:In many cases, the accusation is enough to do that. Lose a job, potentially lose a family, be attacked by strangers. An accusation alone is not grounds to jump to that conclusion without considering the details. But nobody hears someone is accused of raping a 13 year old and just ignores it without it somewhat influencing their perception of that person. Even if you doubt it could have really happened, you question it. In Trump's case, however, he isn't even brought into question despite the dozen or so other women who claim he touched them inappropriately and his own unapologetic misogynist trail of soundbites, gropes and put downs. It's inconceivable how this guy gets a free pass while being a repulsive human being which you would not honestly give a neighbor you have lived next to for twenty years.

This really isn't that complex of an issue? I'll break it down for you


Trump fans: Clearly support Trump despite his flaws. They are going to support their guy until this race is finished. The accusations aimed at Trump have literally no concrete evidence behind them so they have no reason to believe them to be true or to judge Trump guilty of them. A factor for them is the timing of these allegations. Its entirely possible that these women were forced or coerced to make accusations.


Hilary fans: Clearly will follow Hilary until this is all over and automatically will disagree/hate almost everything Trump will do or say. They see the very accusations aimed at Trump as evidence that he is guilty, he is a known lier and dodgy human. To them Trump is already guilty of these crimes, its just a matter of time before one of them sticks to him.


Objective people: Objective people will look at all of this, be able to pick out the lines of truth and make an informed decision based on facts, evidence and a clear head. They realise that Trump is not necessarily what would be considered a "good" person or an angel of any kind. They realise that although these accusations are serious in nature, there is literally no concrete evidence to back up these claims and thus there is no way they can judge Trump guilty. As to do so would simply be wrong and nonobjective.



Any part of this incorrect or that you don't understand?

---