Quote:Did you read through what you just wrote Kotite? Do you not see the fatal flaw in using accusations as circumstantial evidence that those same accusations are true? Come on man.


All of this is just you proving your own bias to yourself. None of this is evidence of guilt , its all opinion and completely subjective.


"common sense would dictate it is more than probable at the very least one of the dozen women accusing him of inappropriate touching is telling the truth."


No. This is not how this works. Common sense does not dictate that you decide guilt or innocence with zero concrete evidence to back up claims.

I am drawing a conclusion based on what I know of the man, his words and his previous actions. I am not choosing to believe something about the man "just because." I am drawing a logical conclusion based on the facts I know and the mountain of circumstantial evidence which points to the likelihood of him doing at least some of these things. If a gun was put to your head and you were asked to honestly say if you felt Trump touched at least one of these women inappropriately you would say you didn't believe he did? Just because there is no concrete evidence you have had presented yet? You'd ignore past allegations, his own words, his own actions, everything you know about him and say.. if I had to objectively draw a conclusion knowing a lot of these accusations are she said/he said.. if I had to choose what I actually believe is true.. I would choose to believe he is wholly innocent of all charges.. really? Knowing it is not carved in stone.. your educated guess.. your hunch says.. not guilty?

---