Quote:Take off your devil's advocate hat for half a second. So.. you're saying, gun to your head.. not convicting him. Not sentencing him. Gun to your head.. you lie and you die.. what you honestly think.. you have to answer.. you have to come to a conclusion, knowing it may not be perfect.. what you actually believe.. you look at everything you know.. you say not guilty? Yes or no. Answer the question.


I'm factoring in everything I know about the guy, his actions, his words, his tendencies. The accusers. The timing. The facts I know. The things I don't. The statistics and probabilities. I'm putting all of the pieces together. I'm not a court of law and I have no smoking gun (yet). I am using common sense objectively and can conclude the likelihood of him to be innocent of all of these charges is almost non-existent. If you are honest enough to answer the question you will also come to this same conclusion. Not that he is black and white guilty of all charges. Not that we are convicting him today. But that all things truly considered, the probability of him being innocent of all charges is miniscule. Basic common sense tells you this.

He is innocent until I see facts/evidence that prove otherwise. Is it possible he grabbed a women by the breasts without her permission? Sure its possible. Is it possible that all of these allegations are false and only used to derail him/get money from him? Yes that's possible too.


All of this is, again, subjective and not objective. Just because you say you are using common sense objectively does not make it so Kotite. You have already decided he is guilty , even without concrete evidence to suggest so.


That you are unable to grasp the flaws in your logic say a lot about you.

---