The article in the OP has me leaning toward a no vote.  The site flsolarchoice.org does a horrible job of explaining why not to vote for this in my opinion as it primarily points to the fact that big energy is for this (so it must be bad right?) but is short on the "why".  The article points out that the bill would write into the state constitution your right to produce solar energy, but it doesn't need to be in there from what I can surmise because there isn't anything in the state constitution that says you can't produce your own solar energy.  The protections from having to subsidize others is nice, but it seems to be them throwing the proverbial bone at voters to get what they really want which is a state constitutionally defined solar industry which will likely be written favorably to the energy companies. 

 

Someone else please expound on this if I'm missing something.

---