Quote:That's because that's what this entire debate as been about. That you can't judge somebody guilty until concrete evidence proves it. You have been disputing that.


As I have said, its entirely possible he groped someone. Its also entirely possible that these are all fabricated tales to throw his campaign off course or to get money from him. He's innocent in my eyes until I see anything that proves he is not.

 

Still being vague in responding to the question.  As I have said, the question is not about assigning innocence or guilt, but your responses keeps going back to this innocent/guilty designation. I am simply asking what you think is most likely.  Do you think he most likely touched a person inappropriately?  

 

I fully understand YOU DON'T KNOW.  I don't KNOW either.  If you're saying no, I do not think he MOST LIKELY touched a person inappropriately, own it by being clear in that response.  If you're saying you DO think he MOST LIKELY touched at least one woman inappropriately, it does not mean anything you have said with respect to not knowing, not having proof, etc. is undone or negated.  I just don't see why you are so resistant to stating what you believe.

---