Quote:We go back to your mission statement here.


"Based on the logic of this message board, I assume people will say all of the other coeds who allege this guy attacked, groped or molested them in some way are making it up."


So again, you agree that Trump shouldn't be judged guilty or innocent without concrete evidence and that there's no reason for Trump fans to assume he is guilty based on the lack of evidence?



I've already stated my opinion you just seem unable to process it. I believe he is innocent as this moment in time.


You forgot to give your opinion on ghosts, do you believe in ghosts?

You are like arguing with a wall sometimes. As I have stated, he shouldn't be judged guilty without evidence. I have never said Trump fans should assume he is guilty based on this lack of evidence. I have made that case that despite a lack of evidence, he is MOST LIKELY guilty of touching at least one of the women who accused him inappropriately and cited reasons why that is what I believe that. It's not that I am unable to process your "opinion," it's that you are deliberately not answering the question as it is posed. You are fixating on what is absolute instead of what you suspect. If this is how you view life, where you cannot form an opinion without absolutes, then you are, as I said an anomaly. (And you would make a terrible detective.)


So I won't be even trying to engage you on this further. You are refusing to answer a question that is based on what you think, not what you can prove, despite the fact others in this thread have shown the capacity to admit he likely did touch at least one woman without consent (you also wouldn't address questions on Oswald, Bigfoot etc.. - since he was found innocent, I'm sure you believe OJ didn't murder anyone either). So I don't feel the need to answer your question on ghosts. You can consider this debate a draw, but I will call it a forfeit.

---