Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
We should be 6-2 at the very least

#17

Quote:No, we shouldn't. We are a bad football team. The Chiefs were at one point without their starting QB, WR1, top 2 RBs, and their superstar TE and we STILL lost with our entire starting offense being healthy. That's how bad we are. The QB is bad and our receivers can't catch. We earned every bit of 2-6.
 

Bingo.  Just like last year.  We should have won our division.  But we didn't, because we are poorly coached.  There's nothing we should be proud of after this loss.

 

This team was destroyed by injuries and we still couldn't beat them.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-06-2016, 05:49 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Sosa - 11-06-2016, 05:50 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Sosa - 11-06-2016, 05:52 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by cland - 11-06-2016, 05:54 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by jagman - 11-06-2016, 05:55 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by BklynJag - 11-06-2016, 06:03 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Vino - 11-06-2016, 06:16 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by The_Anchorman - 11-06-2016, 06:19 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by wg171 - 11-06-2016, 06:21 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-06-2016, 06:22 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Vino - 11-06-2016, 06:22 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Vino - 11-06-2016, 06:24 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by P. Haze - 11-06-2016, 06:54 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by MoJagFan - 11-06-2016, 07:18 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Jest101 - 11-06-2016, 07:22 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by cland - 11-09-2016, 04:27 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Kane - 11-09-2016, 04:48 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by D6 - 11-10-2016, 01:58 AM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by NYC4jags - 11-10-2016, 02:49 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-10-2016, 05:58 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Guest - 11-10-2016, 06:08 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by J-Mizzal - 11-10-2016, 09:40 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Holger - 11-11-2016, 02:03 AM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Jagwired - 11-11-2016, 09:55 AM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by NYC4jags - 11-11-2016, 02:46 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Mowerguy - 11-11-2016, 06:46 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by FBT - 11-11-2016, 08:17 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by FBT - 11-12-2016, 06:19 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-13-2016, 11:03 AM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!