Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
We should be 6-2 at the very least

#21

Quote:No we are not. Just the players who need to play are not playing well.
That means we are a bad football team. Players not performing to the best of their abilities. 2nd in the league in penalties. Undisciplined players. Finding ways to lose. One issue is fixed and another takes its place. These are all signs of a bad football team. We are 2-6 for a reason and it's not because we are secretly good.

 

Quote:Our defense is better then it has been in years. 
 
That isn't saying much, it is still bad.

"A man with no sauce is lost.

<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-06-2016, 05:49 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Sosa - 11-06-2016, 05:50 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Sosa - 11-06-2016, 05:52 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by cland - 11-06-2016, 05:54 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by jagman - 11-06-2016, 05:55 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by BklynJag - 11-06-2016, 06:03 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Vino - 11-06-2016, 06:16 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by wg171 - 11-06-2016, 06:21 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-06-2016, 06:22 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Vino - 11-06-2016, 06:22 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Vino - 11-06-2016, 06:24 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by P. Haze - 11-06-2016, 06:54 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by MoJagFan - 11-06-2016, 07:18 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Jest101 - 11-06-2016, 07:22 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by cland - 11-09-2016, 04:27 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Kane - 11-09-2016, 04:48 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by D6 - 11-10-2016, 01:58 AM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by NYC4jags - 11-10-2016, 02:49 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-10-2016, 05:58 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Guest - 11-10-2016, 06:08 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by J-Mizzal - 11-10-2016, 09:40 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Holger - 11-11-2016, 02:03 AM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Jagwired - 11-11-2016, 09:55 AM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by NYC4jags - 11-11-2016, 02:46 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Mowerguy - 11-11-2016, 06:46 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by FBT - 11-11-2016, 08:17 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by FBT - 11-12-2016, 06:19 PM
We should be 6-2 at the very least - by Cleatwood - 11-13-2016, 11:03 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!