Quote:Bloomberg's a better source than Slate, true.  When you put you link in a shouting font, it's actually harder to see, BTW.

 

Donald asked the Russians to hack the other candidate (on live TV, no less), they complied, and there will be a quid pro quo coming.  Hey, maybe it's not the worst thing in the world, especially if you don't live in the Ukraine.  Every U.S. President has had to deal with despots, and perhaps this is for the best.

I would be much more concerned with the actual millions given by the Saudis to Hillary's campaign than by either of them 'talking' to a foreign country. Seems like the money would be a bit more influential, don't you think?

 

“Saudi Arabia always has sponsored both Republican and Democratic Party of America and in America current election also provide with full enthusiasm 20 percent of the cost of Hillary Clinton’s election even though some events in the country don’t have a positive look to support the king of a woman (sic) for presidency,” the report quoted Prince Mohammed as having said.

 

for a copy of the original transcript:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13...nce-claims

---