Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Article: Conservative agenda aims to kill science in United States


Quote:Now who's projecting? Just because the study found a subset of bozos who responded that way does not mean that everyone responds that way.


 

I posted that "propaganda diatribe" as you call it because it covers the similarities between climate science and religion better than I could, and there are a lot of them. The one it didn't mention that I observe is that science looks for evidence that a theory is wrong, religion looks for evidence that their dogma is right. If you look at the body of work of climate science, you'll see a lot of the latter and very little of the former.


 

I can draw my own conclusions. The data is out there, and the subject of climate is not that difficult. Don't take my word for it, but don't take the word of someone living off of taxpayer dollars which would go away if there were no implied problem either. Go look at the data.


We're talking about a one degree difference. That's typical of walking from one room in a house to another with a door in between. Severe weather is down, the science agrees with this. The rate of sea level rise has been constant for as long as there have been measurements, well over a hundred years. That is evident in the tide gauge data on NOAA.gov. It doesn't take a PhD in science to look at the data, so go look. Then be skeptical when the tax dollar leeches claim otherwise.


Warming at the current rate is not a disaster. Warmer is better. A lot more people retire to Florida than to North Dakota. Meanwhile, the CO2 enrichment of the atmosphere has increased the land area covered by vegetation (i.e. less desert), and that's a good thing in my book.
You posted propaganda and nothing more. It satisfies a bias you have and makes you feel better about yourself. It's as simple as that.

 

Yes, I am projecting the idea that deferring to experts on a subject is a prudent course of action. By all means draw your own conclusions be hunting out drivel written by people that live off fossil fuel money and shockingly agree with what you already want to be true based on what your political leanings dictate you must. Thinking you understand more than experts in a field because you think it's "not that difficult" is the height of arrogance and foolishness. 



Messages In This Thread
Article: Conservative agenda aims to kill science in United States - by boudreaumw - 12-06-2016, 01:54 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!